Dolutegravir (DTG) belongs to the drug class known as Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (InSTI). This class of drugs works by blocking the action of the enzyme integrase, which is responsible for inserting the viral DNA into the host cell’s DNA. By inhibiting this process, InSTIs prevent the virus from replicating and spreading throughout the body.

Protease Inhibitors, Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, and Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors are other classes of drugs used in antiretroviral therapy (ART) for the treatment of HIV. However, Dolutegravir specifically belongs to the InSTI class.

The most likely cause of the rash and subsequent death in this pregnant female is Varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection. VZV is the virus responsible for causing chickenpox and shingles. In pregnant women, VZV infection can lead to severe complications, including pneumonitis, which is inflammation of the lungs.

The presentation of macules (flat, red spots) that progress to vesicles (fluid-filled blisters) is characteristic of VZV infection. The virus can spread throughout the body, leading to systemic symptoms and potentially fatal complications.

Chorioamnionitis is an infection of the placental tissues and amniotic fluid, which can occur during pregnancy but would not typically present with a rash and vesicles. Herpes simplex virus can also cause vesicular rash, but it is less common in pregnant women and does not typically lead to pneumonitis. Listeriosis and rubella are other infections that can cause rash, but they are less likely to present with the specific progression of macules to vesicles seen in this case.

Overall, given the clinical presentation and findings during the post-mortem examination, Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is the most likely cause of the rash and subsequent complications in this pregnant female.

The question asks about an antifungal agent given to a 27-year-old HIV patient that inhibits the biosynthesis of fungal ergosterol. The correct answer is Ketoconazole.

Ketoconazole is a synthetic imidazole antifungal drug that works by inhibiting the biosynthesis of ergosterol in fungi. Ergosterol is an essential component of the fungal cell membrane, and its inhibition disrupts the integrity of the membrane, leading to cell death. Ketoconazole achieves this by blocking demethylation at the C14 site of the ergosterol precursor.

The other options provided in the question are different antifungal agents with varying mechanisms of action. Amphotericin B and Nystatin work by impairing the permeability of the fungal cell membrane. Flucytosine interferes with DNA synthesis in fungi, while Griseofulvin targets the microtubules within the fungal cells.

In summary, Ketoconazole is the correct answer as it inhibits the biosynthesis of fungal ergosterol, making it an effective treatment for fungal infections in patients like the one described in the question.

The reason for switching a pregnant woman on EFV-based ART to a DTG-based regimen after counseling and confirming a viral load of <50 c/ml in the last six months is due to the potential risks associated with EFV during pregnancy. EFV has been associated with an increased risk of neural tube defects in the fetus, particularly when taken in the first trimester of pregnancy. DTG, on the other hand, has shown to be safe and effective in pregnancy with no increased risk of birth defects. Therefore, it is recommended to switch to a DTG-based regimen in order to minimize the potential risks to the fetus. Counseling is important to ensure that the woman understands the reasons for the switch and is informed about the potential benefits and risks of the new regimen. Additionally, confirming a viral load of <50 c/ml ensures that the woman's HIV is well-controlled before making the switch, which is important for both her health and the health of the fetus.

Bacterial vaginosis is a common infection in women that is caused by an overgrowth of atypical bacteria in the vagina. The most common causative agent of bacterial vaginosis is Gardnerella vaginalis, which is a facultative anaerobic bacteria. This means that Gardnerella vaginalis can survive in both oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor environments.

When a woman presents with symptoms of bacterial vaginosis, such as foul-smelling vaginal discharge, Gardnerella vaginalis is the most likely culprit. Other symptoms of bacterial vaginosis may include itching, burning, and irritation in the vaginal area.

In diagnosing bacterial vaginosis, a healthcare provider may take a swab of the vaginal discharge for microscopy. Clue cells, which are vaginal epithelial cells covered in bacteria, are often seen under the microscope in cases of bacterial vaginosis.

It is important to differentiate bacterial vaginosis from other sexually transmitted infections, such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Treponema pallidum. These organisms have different characteristics and require different treatment approaches.

In conclusion, when a 24-year-old woman presents with foul-smelling vaginal discharge, Gardnerella vaginalis is the most likely cause, and bacterial vaginosis should be considered as a possible diagnosis.

For clients on TLD who have never failed a previous ART regimen and have a viral load ≥ 1000 c/mL, the approach of providing enhanced adherence support without resistance testing as a rule is based on the fact that the TLD regimen contains dolutegravir (DTG), which has a high genetic barrier to resistance. This means that even in cases where the viral load is elevated, there is a lower likelihood of developing resistance to DTG compared to other antiretroviral drugs.

By providing enhanced adherence support, healthcare providers can work with the client to address any barriers to adherence and ensure that the medication is being taken consistently and correctly. This approach allows for the possibility of achieving viral suppression without the need for resistance testing or immediate switching to a third-line regimen.

In cases where adherence support alone is not sufficient to achieve viral suppression, resistance testing may be considered to guide the selection of an appropriate alternative regimen. However, the initial approach of focusing on adherence support is a reasonable first step given the high genetic barrier of DTG and the potential for successful viral suppression with improved adherence.

Dolutegravir (DTG) is an antiretroviral medication used to treat HIV infection. In children from ≥ 3 kg and ≥ 4 weeks of age, the recommended formulation of DTG is 10 mg dispersible tablets. These tablets are specifically designed for pediatric use and are easier for children to take compared to other formulations.

The 2014 revised HIV surveillance case definition takes into account all age groups and classifies persons with HIV infection into one of five stages: 0, 1, 2, 3, or unknown. Stage 0 indicates early HIV infection based on a negative or indeterminate HIV test within 6 months of a confirmed positive HIV test result. For children, stages 1, 2, and 3 are determined by the age-specific CD4 cell count (Table 1) or the presence of a stage 3-defining opportunistic illness. Note the CD4 classification is based on the absolute CD4 count—the CD4 percentage is only considered if the absolute CD4 count is missing.

The immunologic classification for children under age 6 differs significantly from that used for adults, mainly because young children typically have CD4 counts that are much higher than those seen in adults. For example, among children younger than 12 months of age who do not have HIV infection, most will have a CD4 count of at least 1500 cells/mm3. The CD4 count normally declines during the first few years of life. It is conceptually very important to understand that children with HIV infection, especially very young children, can develop HIV-related opportunistic infections at higher CD4 counts than typically seen with adults. The HIV classification of this asymptomatic 18-month-old girl with an absolute CD4 cell count of 942 cells/mm3 and no history of an AIDS-defining opportunistic illness would be stage 2.

When a pregnant mother is diagnosed with drug-resistant TB, it is crucial to seek guidance from an expert or healthcare provider due to the complexity of the situation. Drug-resistant TB requires specialized treatment and management, especially in the case of a pregnant woman where the health of both the mother and the unborn child must be considered.

Starting TB preventive therapy immediately may not be sufficient in the case of drug-resistant TB, as the treatment regimen needs to be tailored to the specific drug resistance profile of the bacteria. Initiating ART without delay is important for managing HIV infection in pregnant women, but it may not address the drug-resistant TB infection.

Referring the mother to a virologist or calling the HIV hotline may not be the most appropriate actions in this situation, as the primary concern is the management of the drug-resistant TB infection. Therefore, discussing the case with an expert or healthcare provider who has experience in treating drug-resistant TB in pregnant women is the recommended course of action. This will ensure that the mother receives the most appropriate and effective treatment to protect both her health and the health of her unborn child.

When a client on TLD (Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Dolutegravir) has a viral load ≥ 1000 c/mL after at least two years on treatment and adherence over 80%, it is important to determine the cause of treatment failure before making any changes to the regimen. Resistance testing is recommended in this situation to identify any mutations in the virus that may be causing the treatment failure.

Switching to a second-line ART regimen immediately without knowing the resistance profile of the virus could lead to further treatment failure and development of drug resistance. Doubling the current ART dose is not recommended as it may increase the risk of side effects without necessarily improving treatment efficacy. Focusing on diet and lifestyle changes may be beneficial for overall health but is not a sufficient strategy for managing treatment failure.

Initiating counseling for treatment adherence is important, but in this case, resistance testing should be prioritized to guide the next steps in treatment. Therefore, the correct answer is to perform resistance testing before any regimen changes.

This question presents a case of an 11-year-old girl with a history of recurrent chest infections, fever, productive cough, anorexia, weight loss, and failure to thrive. These symptoms are highly suggestive of cystic fibrosis, a genetic disorder that affects the lungs and digestive system. Patients with cystic fibrosis often have difficulty clearing mucus from their lungs, leading to recurrent infections.

Among the options provided, Pseudomonas is the most likely organism responsible for this presentation. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis and is known to cause respiratory infections in these individuals. It is particularly concerning as it can form biofilms in the airways, making it difficult to treat with antibiotics.

The other options, such as Pneumococcal pneumonia, Staphylococcus, Mycobacterium TB, and PCP, are less likely in this case given the patient’s history of recurrent infections and failure to thrive, which are more indicative of cystic fibrosis. Therefore, the correct answer is Pseudomonas.

In this case, the patient presented with a productive cough with rusty coloured sputum, which is a common symptom of pneumonia. The chest X-ray showed lobar consolidation on the left side, indicating a specific type of pneumonia known as lobar pneumonia.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most likely causative organism in this scenario. This bacterium is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, especially in adults. It is known to cause lobar pneumonia, which is characterized by consolidation of an entire lobe of the lung.

Haemophilus influenzae is another common cause of pneumonia, but it is more commonly associated with bronchitis and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Legionella pneumophila is known to cause Legionnaires’ disease, which presents with symptoms similar to pneumonia but is usually associated with contaminated water sources.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative organism for tuberculosis, which typically presents with a chronic cough, weight loss, and night sweats. Pneumocystis jiroveci is a fungus that causes pneumonia in immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV/AIDS.

Overall, based on the patient’s presentation and the chest X-ray findings, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most likely causative organism for the lobar pneumonia in this 43-year-old female patient.

The patient’s presentation of deeply jaundiced, hypotensive with a tachycardia, and hepatic flap, along with the laboratory findings of significantly elevated liver enzymes (ALT, ALP), coagulopathy (elevated INR), and hyperbilirubinemia, are consistent with acute liver failure. The negative toxicology screen for paracetamol and aspirin rules out drug-induced liver injury from these common medications. The positive hepatitis B surface antibody and negative hepatitis B surface antigen suggest prior exposure to hepatitis B, but not an active infection.

The most likely explanation for the patient’s clinical condition is acute viral hepatitis which is now recovering. The improvement in ALT levels over 6 hours suggests that the liver injury is resolving. Reactivation of hepatitis B infection would typically present with elevated hepatitis B viral load and positive hepatitis B surface antigen, which is not the case in this patient. Wilson’s disease is a genetic disorder that causes copper accumulation in the liver, but it is not the most likely diagnosis in this case. Acute liver failure secondary to alcohol would typically have a different pattern of liver enzyme elevation.

Therefore, the most likely diagnosis for this patient is acute viral hepatitis which is now recovering.

When a client presents with symptoms of tuberculosis (TB), it is important to first confirm whether or not they actually have TB before initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). This is because starting ART in a client with active TB can potentially worsen their condition due to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS).

Therefore, it is recommended to defer ART initiation for clients diagnosed with TB symptoms until TB is excluded. This can be done through various diagnostic tests such as a TB GeneXpert test, sputum smear microscopy, or culture. Once TB is definitively ruled out, ART can be safely initiated without the risk of exacerbating the TB infection.

It is crucial to follow this protocol to ensure the best possible outcomes for clients with both TB and HIV, as well as to prevent any potential complications that may arise from starting ART prematurely in a client with active TB.

Indeterminate HIV-PCR results in infants can be a cause for concern as it is unclear whether the infant is truly infected with HIV or not. In such cases, it is important to take immediate action to determine the infant’s HIV status and provide appropriate care.

The recommended approach for infants with indeterminate HIV-PCR results is to repeat both the HIV-PCR and HIV rapid test urgently. This is necessary to confirm the infant’s HIV status and ensure that appropriate treatment and care can be provided if the infant is indeed infected with HIV.

Initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) immediately may be considered if the repeat tests confirm HIV infection. Discontinuing breastfeeding may also be necessary to prevent transmission of the virus to the infant. Administering high-risk infant prophylaxis can help reduce the risk of HIV transmission in cases where the infant’s HIV status is still uncertain.

It is important not to defer further testing until the infant is older, as early diagnosis and treatment of HIV in infants is crucial for their long-term health outcomes. Therefore, repeating both the HIV-PCR and HIV rapid test urgently is the recommended approach in cases of indeterminate HIV-PCR results in infants.

Vaginal candidiasis, also known as thrush, is a common condition that many women can diagnose and treat themselves. Candida albicans is responsible for about 80% of cases, while other candida species cause the remaining 20%. Although most women have no predisposing factors, certain factors such as diabetes mellitus, antibiotics, steroids, pregnancy, and HIV can increase the likelihood of developing vaginal candidiasis. Symptoms include non-offensive discharge resembling cottage cheese, vulvitis, itching, vulvar erythema, fissuring, and satellite lesions. A high vaginal swab is not routinely indicated if the clinical features are consistent with candidiasis. Treatment options include local or oral therapy, with oral fluconazole 150 mg as a single dose being the first-line treatment according to NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries. If there are vulval symptoms, a topical imidazole may be added to an oral or intravaginal antifungal. Pregnant women should only use local treatments. Recurrent vaginal candidiasis is defined as four or more episodes per year by BASHH. Compliance with previous treatment should be checked, and a high vaginal swab for microscopy and culture should be performed to confirm the diagnosis. A blood glucose test may be necessary to exclude diabetes, and differential diagnoses such as lichen sclerosus should be ruled out. An induction-maintenance regime involving oral fluconazole may be considered. Induction involves taking oral fluconazole every three days for three doses, while maintenance involves taking oral fluconazole weekly for six months.

Listeria infection during pregnancy can have serious consequences for the fetus, with a fetal case mortality rate of 0.25. This means that 25% of fetuses affected by listeria infection do not survive. Listeria Monocytogenes is a bacteria that can be transmitted to the fetus through the placenta, leading to congenital infection. The most common source of the bacteria is contaminated food, particularly unpasteurised milk.

Congenital listeriosis can result in a range of complications for the fetus, including spontaneous abortions, premature birth, and chorioamnionitis. Neonates born with listeriosis may present with symptoms such as septicaemia, respiratory distress, and inflammatory granulomatosis. The overall case mortality rate for listeriosis is estimated to be between 20-30%, highlighting the severity of this infection during pregnancy.

HIV: Transmission, Replication, and Types

HIV, or human immunodeficiency virus, is a virus that attacks the immune system and can lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Here are some important facts about HIV transmission, replication, and types:

Transmission: HIV can be transmitted through certain body fluids, including blood, breast milk, and vaginal/seminal fluids. If these fluids come into contact with a mucous membrane or broken skin, HIV can be transmitted. This means that oral sex can also transmit HIV if vaginal/semen fluids come into contact with the oral cavity.

Replication: HIV is an RNA retrovirus that requires reverse transcriptase to replicate. It contains two copies of genomic RNA. When a target cell is infected, the virus is transcribed into a double strand of DNA and integrated into the host cell genome.

Types: HIV-1 is the most common type of HIV in the UK, whereas HIV-2 is common in West Africa. HIV-1 is more virulent and transmissible than HIV-2. Both types can be transmitted by blood and sexual contact (including oral sex).

Depletion of CD4 T cells: HIV principally targets and destroys CD4 T cells (helper T cells). As a result, humoral and cell-mediated responses are no longer properly regulated, and a decline in immune function results.

Overall, understanding how HIV is transmitted, replicates, and the different types can help in prevention and treatment efforts.

Anal cancer is primarily caused by HPV infection, which is the most significant risk factor. Other factors may also contribute, but the link between HPV infection and anal cancer is the strongest. This is similar to how HPV infection can lead to cervical cancer by causing oncogenic changes in the cervical mucosa.

Understanding Anal Cancer: Definition, Epidemiology, and Risk Factors

Anal cancer is a type of malignancy that occurs exclusively in the anal canal, which is bordered by the anorectal junction and the anal margin. The majority of anal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas, but other types include melanomas, lymphomas, and adenocarcinomas. The incidence of anal cancer is relatively rare, with an annual rate of about 1.5 in 100,000 in the UK. However, the incidence is increasing, particularly among men who have sex with men, due to widespread infection by human papillomavirus (HPV).

There are several risk factors associated with anal cancer, including HPV infection, anal intercourse, a high lifetime number of sexual partners, HIV infection, immunosuppressive medication, a history of cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and smoking. Patients typically present with symptoms such as perianal pain, perianal bleeding, a palpable lesion, and faecal incontinence.

To diagnose anal cancer, T stage assessment is conducted, which includes a digital rectal examination, anoscopic examination with biopsy, and palpation of the inguinal nodes. Imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, endo-anal ultrasound, and PET are also used. The T stage system for anal cancer is described by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the International Union Against Cancer. It includes TX primary tumour cannot be assessed, T0 no evidence of primary tumour, Tis carcinoma in situ, T1 tumour 2 cm or less in greatest dimension, T2 tumour more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension, T3 tumour more than 5 cm in greatest dimension, and T4 tumour of any size that invades adjacent organ(s).

In conclusion, understanding anal cancer is crucial in identifying the risk factors and symptoms associated with this type of malignancy. Early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve the prognosis and quality of life for patients.

Diphtheria is a bacterial infection caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae. It is characterized by the formation of grey membranes on the mucous membranes of the throat and tonsils, which can cause difficulty breathing (dyspnoea). This patient’s recent travel to India is significant because diphtheria is more common in developing countries, including India.

In contrast, infectious mononucleosis (also known as mono) is caused by the Epstein-Barr virus and typically presents with symptoms such as fever, sore throat, and swollen lymph nodes. Acute follicular tonsillitis is an infection of the tonsils usually caused by bacteria such as Streptococcus pyogenes. Scarlet fever is a bacterial infection caused by Streptococcus pyogenes that presents with a characteristic rash.

Agranulocytosis is a condition characterized by a severe decrease in the number of white blood cells, which can lead to increased susceptibility to infections. However, the presence of grey membranes on the uvula and tonsils is not a typical finding in agranulocytosis.

Therefore, based on the patient’s symptoms and recent travel history to India, the most likely diagnosis is diphtheria. It is important to confirm the diagnosis with laboratory tests and start appropriate treatment, which may include antibiotics and antitoxin therapy.

When a client on TLD (Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-Lamivudine-Dolutegravir) has a viral load ≥ 1000 c/mL after at least two years on treatment, it is important to assess the situation carefully before making any changes to the regimen. Performing a resistance test is crucial in this scenario as it helps determine if the client has developed resistance to any of the components of the TLD regimen. This information is essential for clinicians to make informed decisions about the next steps in managing the client’s HIV treatment.

Switching immediately to a third-line regimen may not be necessary if the resistance test shows that the client’s virus is still susceptible to the current TLD regimen. Continuing TLD and focusing on addressing adherence issues may be a more appropriate approach in this case. If the resistance test reveals resistance to one or more components of TLD, then adding another antiretroviral drug to the current regimen or switching to a third-line regimen may be necessary.

In conclusion, performing a resistance test before making any changes to the regimen for clients on TLD with a viral load ≥ 1000 c/mL after at least two years on treatment is essential for appropriate management based on the resistance profile. This approach ensures that the client receives the most effective and personalized treatment for their HIV infection.

Breastfeeding is a complex issue, especially for mothers living with HIV. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of a baby’s life, as breast milk provides essential nutrients and antibodies that help protect against infections. However, for mothers living with HIV, there is a risk of transmitting the virus to their baby through breastfeeding.

Mixed feeding with formula milk is not preferred over exclusive breastfeeding because formula milk does not provide the same level of protection against infections and may increase the risk of HIV transmission. Additionally, mixed feeding without proper guidance and support can lead to challenges in maintaining maternal viral suppression.

Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs can significantly reduce the risk of HIV transmission through breastfeeding. Therefore, the WHO Practice Statements emphasize that exclusive breastfeeding is recommended, but mixed feeding with formula milk is acceptable in the presence of ARV drugs and maternal viral suppression. It is important for mothers living with HIV to work closely with healthcare providers to develop a feeding plan that prioritizes the health and well-being of both the mother and the baby.

Among people living with HIV in 2021, approximately 85% knew their HIV status according to WHO estimates.

Viral load monitoring is crucial for newly diagnosed HIV-positive pregnant women who are already on antiretroviral therapy (ART) because it helps to assess the effectiveness of the treatment in suppressing the virus. Monitoring viral load levels every 3 months allows healthcare providers to closely track the progress of the treatment and make any necessary adjustments to ensure viral suppression is achieved.

Regular viral load monitoring is important during pregnancy because untreated HIV can lead to serious complications for both the mother and the baby. By monitoring viral load levels every 3 months, healthcare providers can ensure that the mother’s viral load remains undetectable, reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Additionally, frequent viral load monitoring can help identify any potential issues with the treatment regimen early on, allowing for prompt intervention and adjustment if needed. This can help optimize treatment outcomes for both the mother and the baby.

Overall, conducting viral load monitoring every 3 months for newly diagnosed HIV-positive pregnant women already on ART is essential for ensuring viral suppression, reducing the risk of transmission, and promoting the health and well-being of both the mother and the baby.

Abandoned infants with unknown HIV exposure are managed as higher-risk, HIV-exposed infants because they are considered to be at increased risk of HIV infection due to their unknown exposure status. This approach ensures that these infants receive appropriate care and treatment in a timely manner to prevent HIV transmission and improve their health outcomes.

Immediate ART initiation based on assumptions is not recommended as it is important to confirm the infant’s HIV status before starting treatment. Waiting for parental consent before any procedure may delay necessary interventions for the infant’s health. Providing only supportive care without specific HIV-focused interventions may put the infant at risk of HIV transmission if they are indeed infected.

Therefore, treating abandoned infants with unknown HIV exposure as higher-risk, HIV-exposed infants allows for prompt initiation of ART and appropriate follow-up testing to confirm their HIV status and provide necessary care. This approach aligns with the guidelines for managing infants with potential HIV exposure and ensures the best possible outcomes for these vulnerable infants.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) is caused by prions, which are abnormal proteins that can cause normal proteins in the brain to become misfolded and form clumps. Prions are not living organisms like viruses, bacteria, parasites, or arachnids, but rather infectious proteins that can cause neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In the case of vCJD, it is believed to be caused by consuming food contaminated with prions, particularly from animals infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), also known as mad cow disease. This makes prions the correct answer for the pathogen in variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) is crucial for the successful management of HIV/AIDS. Encouraging clients to discontinue ART during periods of travel is not recommended as it can lead to treatment interruptions and decreased viral suppression. This can result in the development of drug resistance and compromised immune function.

On the other hand, interventions such as mobile phone reminders, home-based care, community-based adherence clubs, and peer support groups have been shown to be effective in supporting adherence to ART and retention in care. Mobile phone reminders can help clients remember to take their medication on time, while home-based care can provide support and monitoring in a familiar environment. Community-based adherence clubs and peer support groups offer social support and a sense of belonging, which can motivate clients to stay on track with their treatment.

Cotrimoxazole is an antibiotic commonly used to prevent and treat infections in infants who are exposed to HIV. In the context of HIV-exposed infants, it is important to continue cotrimoxazole until it is deemed safe to stop based on certain criteria.

Cotrimoxazole should be stopped for infants when PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) testing is negative for HIV ≥ 6 weeks after full cessation of breastfeeding AND the infant is clinically HIV negative. This criteria ensures that the infant has not been infected with HIV and is no longer at risk of developing HIV-related infections.

Therefore, stopping cotrimoxazole in this scenario is safe and appropriate as it indicates that the infant is no longer in need of the antibiotic for HIV prevention.

If a pregnant woman has a viral load of less than 50 copies/mL at 36 weeks, vaginal delivery is recommended. Therefore, in this case, the correct answer is to proceed with vaginal delivery. It is not necessary to prepare for a caesarian section as the pregnancy is considered safe without surgical intervention. Re-testing the HIV viral load is not necessary as the current recommendation is to test at 36 weeks. Starting antiretroviral infusion during vaginal delivery is also not necessary as the woman is already on regular therapy and has an undetectable viral load. Antiretroviral infusion is typically used during a caesarean section when the viral load is greater than 50 copies/mL.

HIV and Pregnancy: Guidelines for Minimizing Vertical Transmission

With the increasing prevalence of HIV infection among heterosexual individuals, there has been a rise in the number of HIV-positive women giving birth in the UK. In fact, in London alone, the incidence may be as high as 0.4% of pregnant women. The primary goal of treating HIV-positive women during pregnancy is to minimize harm to both the mother and fetus, and to reduce the chance of vertical transmission.

To achieve this goal, various factors must be considered. Firstly, all pregnant women should be offered HIV screening, according to NICE guidelines. Additionally, antiretroviral therapy should be offered to all pregnant women, regardless of whether they were taking it previously. This therapy has been shown to significantly reduce vertical transmission rates, which can range from 25-30% to just 2%.

The mode of delivery is also an important consideration. Vaginal delivery is recommended if the viral load is less than 50 copies/ml at 36 weeks. If the viral load is higher, a caesarean section is recommended, and a zidovudine infusion should be started four hours before the procedure. Neonatal antiretroviral therapy is also typically administered to the newborn, with zidovudine being the preferred medication if the maternal viral load is less than 50 copies/ml. If the viral load is higher, triple ART should be used, and therapy should be continued for 4-6 weeks.

Finally, infant feeding is an important consideration. In the UK, all women should be advised not to breastfeed, as this can increase the risk of vertical transmission. By following these guidelines, healthcare providers can help to minimize the risk of vertical transmission and ensure the best possible outcomes for both mother and child.

The most probable diagnosis in this case is hereditary spherocytosis. This conclusion is based on the patient’s presentation of jaundice, fatigue, and abdominal pain, along with a history of chronic fatigue and previous episodes of hepatitis. The absence of fever and travel history to endemic areas makes acute hepatitis and cholecystitis less likely.

The blood results showing low hemoglobin levels, high MCV, high reticulocyte count, and elevated LDH also point towards a chronic hemolytic anemia. The negative Coombs test rules out autoimmune hemolytic anemia, leaving hereditary spherocytosis as the most likely cause.

Hereditary spherocytosis is a genetic disorder that causes red blood cells to be more fragile, leading to their destruction and resulting in anemia. Splenomegaly and gallstones are common complications of this condition due to increased red cell destruction and hemoglobin metabolism. Abdominal ultrasound showing an enlarged spleen further supports the diagnosis of hereditary spherocytosis.