00
Correct
00
Incorrect
00 : 00 : 00
Session Time
00 : 00
Average Question Time ( Secs)
  • Question 1 - A patient who is a known case of rheumatoid arthritis presents to the...

    Correct

    • A patient who is a known case of rheumatoid arthritis presents to the clinic as his grandson was recently diagnosed with chickenpox. His grandson spent the weekend with her, and he was in close contact with him. He takes 50 mg of prednisolone once daily and has been for the past six months. There is no history of chickenpox.

      Out of the following, which is TRUE regarding the next plan of action for her care?

      Your Answer: She should receive prophylactic varicella-zoster Immunoglobulin (VZIG)

      Explanation:

      Varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) is indicated for post exposure prevention and treatment of varicella. It is recommended as prophylaxis for high-risk patients with no known immunity (i.e. no known previous chickenpox) who have had a significant exposure to varicella-zoster (considered >4 hours close contact).

      The high-risk groups are:
      1. Neonates
      2. Pregnant women
      3. The immunocompromised (e.g. cancer, immunosuppressive therapies)
      4. Those on high dose steroids (children on more than 2 mg/kg/day for more than 14 days, or adults on 40 mg/day for more than a week)

      This patient is at high risk of developing adrenal insufficiency and may need a temporary increase in her steroid dose during infection or stress. It would be inappropriate to stop or wean down her dose of prednisolone and can cause side effects.

      Since he is on steroids without immunity for chickenpox, he is at risk of developing severe varicella infection, with possible complications including pneumonia, hepatitis and DIC.

      If he develops a varicella infection, he will need to be admitted and require a specialist review and intravenous Acyclovir.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Immunological Products & Vaccines
      • Pharmacology
      133.6
      Seconds
  • Question 2 - A patient presents with haemoptysis, weight loss, and night sweats. You suspect he...

    Correct

    • A patient presents with haemoptysis, weight loss, and night sweats. You suspect he may have tuberculosis. He works at an asylum seeker hostel, and has not received a BCG vaccination. In which of the following patient groups would the BCG vaccine be safe to administer?

      Your Answer: The patient is asplenic

      Explanation:

      Persons with chronic diseases. Persons with chronic renal disease or undergoing dialysis, and those with hyposplenism or asplenia, may receive BCG vaccine if indicated.

      Only 2 absolute contraindications apply to all vaccines:

      • anaphylaxis following a previous dose of the relevant vaccine
      • anaphylaxis following any component of the relevant vaccine

      2 further contraindications apply to live vaccines (both parenteral and oral):

      • People who are significantly immunocompromised should not receive live vaccines. This is regardless of whether the immunocompromising condition is caused by disease or treatment.
      • Pregnant women should not receive live vaccines, in general. Women should be advised not to become pregnant within 28 days of receiving a live vaccine.

      Use of live vaccines in people who are immunocompromised:
      People who are immunocomprised are at risk of adverse events or vaccine-related disease if they receive a live vaccine.

      Live vaccines include:

      BCG (bacille Calmette–Guérin) vaccine
      oral cholera vaccine (Vaxchora)
      Some Japanese encephalitis virus vaccines
      MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine
      rotavirus vaccine
      oral typhoid vaccine
      varicella vaccine
      yellow fever vaccine
      zoster vaccine (Zostavax)

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Immunological Products & Vaccines
      • Pharmacology
      9.6
      Seconds
  • Question 3 - You're evaluating a 37-year-old woman who is 12 weeks pregnant. She has experienced...

    Correct

    • You're evaluating a 37-year-old woman who is 12 weeks pregnant. She has experienced vaginal bleeding.

      Which of the following anti-D statements is correct?

      Your Answer: Routine antenatal prophylaxis is recommended for RhD negative women at 28 and 34 weeks

      Explanation:

      Anti-D is an IgG antibody that targets the antigen Rhesus D (RhD). Plasma from rhesus-negative donors who have been immunised against the anti-D-antigen is used to make anti-D immunoglobulin.

      Only RhD negative women are given Anti-D Ig. Women who are RhD negative do not have the RhD antigen on their RBC. If a foetus has the RhD antigen (i.e. is RhD positive) and the mother is exposed to foetal blood, she may develop antibodies to RhD that pass through the placenta and attack foetal red cells (resulting in newborn haemolytic disease). Anti-D is given to bind and neutralise foetal red cells in the maternal circulation before an immune response is triggered. In the event of a sensitising event, 500 IU Anti-D Ig should be administered intramuscularly.

      The following are examples of potentially sensitising events:
      Birth
      Haemorrhage during pregnancy
      Miscarriage
      Ectopic pregnancy
      Death within the womb
      Amniocentesis
      Chorionic villus sampling
      Trauma to the abdomen

      The sooner anti-D is given in the event of a sensitising event, the better; however, it is most effective within 72 hours, and the BNF states that it is still likely to have some benefit if given outside of this time frame.

      At 28 and 34 weeks, RhD negative women should receive routine antenatal prophylaxis. This is regardless of whether they have previously received Anti-D for a sensitising event during the same pregnancy.

      Prophylactic anti-D is not necessary before 12 weeks gestation, as confirmed by scan, in uncomplicated miscarriage (where the uterus is not instrumented), or mild, painless vaginal bleeding, as the risk of foeto-maternal haemorrhage (FMH) is negligible. In cases of therapeutic termination of pregnancy, whether by surgical or medical means, 250 IU of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin should be given to confirmed RhD negative women who are not known to be RhD sensitised.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Immunological Products & Vaccines
      • Pharmacology
      6.7
      Seconds
  • Question 4 - The patients listed below have had wounds or injuries and were treated as...

    Incorrect

    • The patients listed below have had wounds or injuries and were treated as described in a local walk-in clinic.

      Which of the following patients has had adequate tetanus protection?

      Your Answer:

      Correct Answer: 80-year-old diabetic, a rusty nail went through his shoe and into his foot when walking in the woods, uncertain of vaccination history - receives vaccination and immunoglobulin

      Explanation:

      25-year-old receives immunoglobulin and vaccination after cutting her hand on a drinking glass and not knowing her vaccination history.

      Because this is not a tetanus-prone wound, immunoglobulin is not recommended. Because you can’t be sure about her vaccination history, now is the best time to start a tetanus vaccination course to ensure coverage later in life. The first vaccination should be administered at the time of presentation; the patient’s own GP should then review the patient’s vaccination history and schedule the rest of the course as needed.

      8-year-old whose hand was cut with a kitchen knife, received her first round of vaccinations as a baby and a booster at the age of four – receives vaccination:
      The tetanus vaccinations for this child are up to date, and the next booster should not be given too soon. Immunoglobulin is not required because this is not a tetanus-prone wound.

      80-year-old diabetic, a rusty nail went through his shoe and into his foot while walking in the woods, and he was uncertain of his vaccination history – he received vaccination and immunoglobulin:
      A tetanus vaccination course may not have been completed by an 80-year-old UK resident (the vaccination was introduced in 1961). The vaccination should be given at a walk-in clinic, and the patient’s own GP should be contacted to confirm vaccination history and to schedule the rest of the course as needed. Because this is a tetanus-prone wound (puncture wound and potential soil contact), immunoglobulin would be recommended in a patient with incomplete tetanus vaccinations.

      A 28-year-old Polish man cuts his leg while working in the garden, the wound is heavily contaminated with soil, and his vaccination history is unknown – he receives vaccination:
      In a patient with an unknown vaccination history, this is a tetanus-prone wound. In this case, the best course of action would be to administer both the vaccination and immunoglobulin at the walk-in clinic, then contact the patient’s own GP to check his or her vaccination history and schedule the rest of the course as needed.

      30-year-old with a large amount of devitalized tissue in the torso from an electrical burn – has had all vaccinations, so no need for vaccination or immunoglobulin:
      Because this is a high-risk tetanus wound (with a lot of devitalized tissue), even if the patient has had a full course of vaccinations in the past, immunoglobulin is recommended. There is no need for any additional vaccinations.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Immunological Products & Vaccines
      • Pharmacology
      0
      Seconds

SESSION STATS - PERFORMANCE PER SPECIALTY

Immunological Products & Vaccines (3/3) 100%
Pharmacology (3/3) 100%
Passmed